I was remiss in attributing the authorship as AI generated. I provided all the information used in the post.
I provided a recognised journalistic tool with two documents. The minutes are readily available to the public. Anyone who listened to the live streaming or attended the Council meeting would have heard my discussion. I submitted my discussion to the program, in its entirety. I asked the program for an audio version which is simply another way of presenting information and is a powerful AI tool. Many people do not watch the live streaming of Council meetings and do not wish to read pages of minutes of meetings. They would preferred to listen to a discussion based only on the facts.
For clarity, the following discussion only uses the following two sources of information:
- A transcript of the amendment (which was ultimately defeated 4-2) and my discussion that I put up to the Ordinary Council Meeting , and
- The motion that was adopted by Council extracted from the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting 18 June 26
